C-Span hosted a call=in discussion about the tech giant leaders and Congress. Following was a C-Span discussion about whether Americans are religious. Some people recognize a connection.
C-Span hosted a discussion this morning with 2 Trump-Executive bureaucrats who said the goal was promotion of the financial status of under-served communities.
The Military-Industrial Complex isn’t We The People, Hamas is not the Palestinian local community, and the Israels who spent the last several weeks vociferously protesting their ultra-right-wing governance isn’t the Israeli government.
A change is in the wind in MSM as it catches the tail end of awakening to governance in the USA that seems intent on destroying democracy.
Some people have consistently recognized the association between good mental health and nature. A reason is that people are of nature. American re-education of the public into a consumer mindset has artificially substituted Establishment interests in place of nature to the extent of mental health harm to portions of the public and society in general.
One has noticed that Openthebooks appear to lean Conservative. The militarization of local law enforcement appears to promote hierarchical interests both Democratic and Republican. Similar to foreign military involvement of the US, nation against nation hurts all local community members for the benefit of oligarchs who use patriotism as the reason for war when it is more about personal oligarchical wealth retention.
Someone once said, if you can explain it to others, you probably understand it yourself. This proved to be true.
C-Span ran a bit of a speech by someone named Mike Gallagher-R, in which he said (paraphrase) the CCP (China) took advantage of US “good faith”. Probably he’s referring to the blind trust of US politicians (AKA jumping through corporate hoops) in imposing the national security risk upon the US public known as globalism, in which jobs, manufacturing, and control evolved to China.
It’s like they think we can’t see them.
This sort of exposes the maniacal undercurrent of NATO, does’t it?—