Are we capable of breaking away from capitalistic dictatorship in order to enjoy the benefits of AI? So far one is skeptical.
CEO’s per capita absorb more wealth from a company than do workers per capita. Logically AI should replace upper management rather than workers.
Personally one finds the least of superstitious indoctrination among local-community people. Alternatively, Establishment interjects fear among local-community people when plain truth and FACTS would be better.
Look behind the curtain.
C-Span hosted an interesting view abut AI this morning. The recent commentary has been whether AI will take over humanity to the extent of replacement. AI, like for example the Industrial Revolution, will be whatever humanity lets it be.
A new normal is in place in the USA about which youngsters are oblivious. Professional designation is the smokescreen for dictatorial control. Education indoctrinates into capitalism rather than teaches democracy.
So how is banning action by AI different from the following——fantasies that included spreading disinformation, engineering a deadly virus, and… stealing nuclear access codes.——–different from current foreign policy and military action in the service of oligarchs? Is the deflection to reining in AI meant to take the pressure off of the dictatorial hierarchy of oligarchy? Technology has outpaced human ethics, but to target technology instead of ethical behavior is absurd.—–
Hierarchical capitalistic Establishment has espoused the concept that capitalism is democracy and that the foundation of this system is fair-market principle. And so Establishment has implemented a system of surveillance of “consumers” to ensure control of actions of citizens to the whims of marketing. Corporations and big-money interests seem to have a questionable access to the privacy of We The People. Therefore it feels only fair that the public, in self defense, be aware of and consider the motivation and profiteering by such entities.