If women fail to notice the extent life is out of balance toward patriarchy, why should patriarchy?  Blissful chauvinism works for hierarchical Establishment.

Women have been written out of history.  Not only the enormity of witch hunts that censored women while permitting patriarchy to legally grab the property and wealth of women in the process, but also the abilities of women that have been ignored.  Patriarchy has replaced the feminine in society with attitudes of contempt.  Only recently a talk-show host who periodically reminds the audience of his background in clinical psychology, seemed to extend the prejudice toward misogyny by using the phrase “son of a b___h”.  But perhaps this is a clinical psychology idea about which the uninformed wouldn’t be aware. -.,to%20practice%20psychology%20in%202006.

Such language can perpetuate the idea of supremacy.  We must be, if we’re at all informed, of use of misogyny in politics.  Politics in the USA is less about governing and more about promotion of the hierarchy buoyed by patriarchy for specific groups of people who exploit for personal gain.

So to find the following information about women in philosophy was refreshing.  Without a full spectrum of information, one could begin to doubt one’s senses.  —-

Then why was she forgotten? The history of 20th-century philosophy is largely shaped by handbooks, textbooks, companions or anthologies. By the choices they make, by the texts they rely on, historians, editors and educators influence our ideas about who are and who are not important philosophers. Jones’s name is not in the handbooks. Why not? Perhaps it was due to the supremacy of modern mathematical logic, which reduced the old Aristotelian logic that Jones uses to a mere special case. The fact that Russell was personally exasperated by Jones and her Victorian mindset, describing her in a letter to Ottoline Morrell as ‘motherly’ and ‘prissy’, may not have helped either. But, whatever the precise causes, Jones does not deserve to be consigned to oblivion.

–end of aeon info–

One thinks due to personal experience, that women and many men may have a different view of life than may hierarchical Establishment.  The actual character of the feminist view may be less violent and aggressive, and is therefore more easily censored by those who embrace aggression and violence.

This doesn’t mean that the views of those who are violent and aggressive are better, and may actually mean exactly the opposite.

Patriarchy as mentioned in one’s ideas relates to a mindset, not to gender.  Many women support patriarchy and many men don’t.  —

LIVE: New Proof US Is World’s Largest Killing Machine (& much more)

–end of leecamp info–

If patriarchy has been uncomfortably confused with Supremacy, there may be a reason for this, such as similarity in process and intention, not to mention self-promotion.****

As one who would be perfectly contented to retain the Senate if they adhered to Oaths of Office more than to Citizens United campaign donations, one is interested in a topic raised as to the reason we maintain the US Senate——–

 This is a reminder of how much we don’t know.  This brings one around to Howie Hawkins, who continues to impress with original thought.  We also could acknowledge Hawkins often speaks to censored information.
One such topic about which one would never have even considered, is whether the USA needs The Senate.  Apparently The Senate is little other than expensive window dressing, promoting hierarchical interests, and too often placed in positions of power by big-money via Citizens United.  But the public gets to fund this curiosity of pompous supremacy.  Who knew?
The Democratic Branch of the Republican/Democratic Duopoly are especially functional in voter suppression—–          —#GreenSocialist Notes #76
Howie Hawkins brings up the concept of whether the USA needs the Senate.  Apparently according to some people, the Senate isn’t necessary.  This brings up the blockage from the Senate of many bills that would benefit We The People.  Combined with Citizens United that promotes big-money interest choice of Senators, in which laws are passed that benefit big-money interest rather than We The People, and that We The People support economically, the members of the Senate, this seems a good topic for discussion.
The US Constitution doesn’t seem to sanction elections run by political Parties, and to permit control of political debates by political Parties seems equally corrupt.       —

Ross Perot in 1992 on NAFTA and the “Giant Sucking Sound”

Centralization is the lifeblood of the R&D duopoly.  It’s the way to enforce capitalism onto workers in 2022.———————–We can do better———-

That “we are a 2-Party system” is a fabrication of the Republican/Democratic duopoly and spread by MSM.  In FACT the majority of voters aren’t either registered Democratic or Republican.  The censorship about this info must be envied by bureaucrats of the Former USSR and their simplistic style of 1-Party elections.  

Regardless of which character sits in the Oval Office, We The People have work to do to maintain principles of our democratic (small d) Constitutional republic.  Several items to challenge—*We need the integrity of ranked-choice voting so voters won’t feel compelled to “hold your nose and vote”*Censored debates must be stopped.  The Democratic/Republican duopoly pretends to legitimate debates in what is nothing other than another campaign show.  Independent debates run by uninterested sponsors such as The League of Women Voters, must be restored.  (Access to understand the extent of duopoly control).  The so-called Debate Commission is a corporation to promote the Democratic corporation and Republican corporation, not to inform We The People*Challenge and stop gerrymandering that is a trick especially of the Republican branch of the duopoly.*Stop voter suppression by political Parties, and especially confront and stop Party suppression, which is the over-arching approach to voter suppression.  Party suppression seems to have been the responsibility of the Democratic corporation*Promote by law ranked-choice voting, so we won’t be told again, by D&R duopoly, to “hold your nose and vote”
If these issues are handled, our next elections can be honorable. 
*******************************************************************—-Political Party affiliation of voters.–LEAGUE REFUSES TO “HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.