PYRAMID SCHEME NATION
Because Pyramid Schemes are illegal in the USA, language was developed by an especially curious President, calling the economic strategy The Trickle Down Theory.
The Trickle Down Theory functioned as would any Pyramid Scheme, but sans the label that would render the function as racketeering.
Those who define our lives in the character of law enforcement and lawmakers, therefore can define their own process into legal-eeze that fly under the radar of prosecution.
*In our governance, and as surely in the Southern Tier of NYS, one would be wise to be on the lookout for the lipstick on the pigs of Pyramid Scheme purveyors in the guise of governance.
Another smoke screen from the elite D&R Duopoly is to divide and conquer We The People, which has pitted voter against voter, the better to handle politically by the top of this Pyramid Scheme. This discomfort of the electorate was touched upon in an excellent interview from Frank Luntz.
Washington Journal: Frank Luntz Discusses Campaign 2024 —-
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 | PART OF WASHINGTON JOURNAL 02/28/2024
Washington Journal
Frank Luntz on Campaign 2024
Frank Luntz talked about political news of the day and campaign 202 –end of c-span info–
That the political-Party corporations of the Democratic/Republican duopoly, that has no right to inclusion in the workings of the electoral process of We The People, have insinuated Pyramid-Scheme officials as our only choices in most political races, does not seem legal.
When can this be discussed? If discussed, will we be prosecuted and “cracked down” upon? Is the local-governing body use of the concept of “crack down” just another banal oligarchical ploy to control? Should we discuss this, and will we be prosecuted by those who envision their own Supremacy over civil, human, and natural rights? How is this different from dictatorship and/or communism? Should we discuss this and expect answers from this Supreme group?
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 | PART OF WASHINGTON JOURNAL 02/28/2024
Washington Journal
Frank Luntz on Campaign 2024
Frank Luntz talked about political news of the day and campaign 2024.
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 | PART OF WASHINGTON JOURNAL 02/28/2024
–end of c-span in
Washington Journal
Frank Luntz on Campaign 2024
Frank Luntz talked about political news of the day and campaign 2024.
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 | PART OF WASHINGTON JOURNAL 02/28/2024
Washington Journal
Frank Luntz on Campaign 2024
Frank Luntz talked about political news of the day and campaign 2024.
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 | PART OF WASHINGTON JOURNAL 02/28/2024
| Frank I. Luntz | C-SPAN.org |
Washington Journal
Frank Luntz on Campaign 2024
Frank Luntz talked about political news of the day and campaign 2024.
| Frank I. Luntz | C-SPAN.org |
fo–
James Comer is reported on C-Span this morning advocating for the investigation of the Biden shell corporations which is a valid pursuit no less vital to America than investigation of the Kushner/Trump family Dynasty with similar ties to foreign governmental oligarchs.
Diversion of the attention of the electorate toward the political-Party presented so-called candidates, in an electoral process in which the political-Party bosses have no legitimacy, effectively takes choice away from voters and toward an illegitimate process of election from each of the branches of the Democratic/Republican Party Duopoly.
When law enforcement from this hierarchy threaten “crack down” from those questioning this system, how do we differentiate this type of democratic (small d) Constitutional Republic from, for example, dictatorship or communism? Should this be discussed, or would this discussion cause further threats of “crack down”, followed by legislation from said hierarchy to ensure their supposed Supremacy?
Should we discuss this? When the court system is as compromised as it currently is, by the corruption of money in the process, which money seems indicative of corruption and racketeering, what will be the best avenue for the person wishing human, civil, and natural rights?
Should we discuss this?