Most people have heard spoken of, “the new world order”.  This is consistently spoken of as to have been inculcated into the public thought process.  We haven’t heard a logical and precise definition of what this will entail.  This topic comes to mind due to a question that went unanswered from a C-Span caller at about 8:45AM in which a caller questioned about what “the new world order” as first mentioned by Bush (he didn’t say which Bush, but does it matter?) might be.  

After googling the phrase, suggestions of a “conspiracy theory” arose.  —  https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/academics/centers-initiatives/ctec/ctec-publications/new-world-order-historical-origins-dangerous

“The new world order” may be a conspiracy theory but may also be taken seriously by “many of the elite”.  So what is one to make of that?  —  https://www.jstor.org/stable/27552166–

One supposes conspiracy theories can nonetheless be acted upon by motivated players, such as “the elite”.  

We surely have watched an American transformation of the US culture since the Bush eras, away from democracy.  

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/8354      —  The Guardian Investigates the Nazi Ties of Bush’s Grandfather

“The elite” didn’t arise from a strong work ethic, from a minimum wage job beginning, and using native intelligence and perseverance.  Some sort of world order probably worked in their favor.

Any insinuation that oligarchy is only for Russians is just that….insinuation.  Also, the support system toward the end of oligarchy is capitalism, in one person’s opinion.  

So perhaps we should have explanations from “the elite” as to their impression of what “a new world order” is; and since Bush isn’t doing much, we could start by asking him his definition of that which he proposed.

C-Span–8:35AM-caller—paraphrase–Callers should be asked their occupations or previous occupation, if retired.

This morning on C-Span, rather than dividing by lines for Democrats, Republicans, or Independents, the division was by income.  This was a welcome change toward humanization of We The People over designation by political party that serves to indoctrinate into categories of cogs in a political machine.  We might better, to retain a semblance of humanity, choose categories by eye color or shoe size.  This could help toward focus upon citizens in a democratic (small d) Constitutional republic rather than hierarchy in capitalism imagined by dictatorial self interest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdPy5Ikn7dw  —

George Carlin – on airlines and flying

Women’s rights are human rights.—

https://www.aol.com/news/minnesota-enshrines-abortion-rights-state-224840584.html    –Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz signed legislation on Tuesday that codifies abortion rights and protects reproductive care in the state, while opponents have called it one of the most extreme in the nation. The law states that “every individual has a fundamental right to make autonomous decisions about the individual’s own reproductive health.”

–end of aol info–

Human rights are connected to nature rights.—https://wildhunt.org/2023/01/legal-recognition-of-indigenous-land-improves-forest-outcomes-study-says.html —

The researchers note, “Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant populations, and local communities have claims to over half the planet’s land, yet only 10% of the planet is legally recognized with communal land ownership rights.”

However, the researchers said, political systems worldwide undermine Indigenous claims to ancestral lands. They noted that encroachment through squatters and land-grabbers, as well as industries that extract resources from the land such as mining and logging, present a constant threat to Indigenous lands.–end of wildhunt info–

Laws seem to support claims of privilege by moneyed interests that may be contrary to nature rights and human rights.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLODGhEyLvk   —

Life Is Worth Losing – Dumb Americans – George Carlin

–end of georgecarlin info–

****As one who would be perfectly contented to retain the Senate if they adhered to Oaths of Office more than to Citizens United campaign donations, one is interested in a topic raised as to the reason we maintain the US Senate—-

 This is a reminder of how much we don’t know.  This brings one around to Howie Hawkins, who continues to impress with original thought.  We also could acknowledge Hawkins often speaks to censored information.
One such topic about which one would never have even considered, is whether the USA needs The Senate.  Apparently The Senate is little other than expensive window dressing, promoting hierarchical interests, and too often placed in positions of power by big-money via Citizens United.  But the public gets to fund this curiosity of pompous supremacy.  Who knew?
The Democratic Branch of the Republican/Democratic Duopoly are especially functional in voter suppression—–https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNbdkuU1edw          —#GreenSocialist Notes #76
Howie Hawkins brings up the concept of whether the USA needs the Senate.  Apparently according to some people, the Senate isn’t necessary.  This brings up the blockage from the Senate of many bills that would benefit We The People.  Combined with Citizens United that promotes big-money interest choice of Senators, in which laws are passed that benefit big-money interest rather than We The People, and that We The People support economically, the members of the Senate, this seems a good topic for discussion.
The US Constitution doesn’t seem to sanction elections run by political Parties, and to permit control of political debates by political Parties seems equally corrupt.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ7kn2-GEmM       —

Ross Perot in 1992 on NAFTA and the “Giant Sucking Sound”

Centralization is the lifeblood of the R&D duopoly.  It’s the way to enforce capitalism onto workers in 2022.———————–We can do better———-

That “we are a 2-Party system” is a fabrication of the Republican/Democratic duopoly and spread by MSM.  In FACT the majority of voters aren’t either registered Democratic or Republican.  The censorship about this info must be envied by bureaucrats of the Former USSR and their simplistic style of 1-Party elections.  

Regardless of which character sits in the Oval Office, We The People have work to do to maintain principles of our democratic (small d) Constitutional republic.  Several items to challenge—*We need the integrity of ranked-choice voting so voters won’t feel compelled to “hold your nose and vote”*Censored debates must be stopped.  The Democratic/Republican duopoly pretends to legitimate debates in what is nothing other than another campaign show.  Independent debates run by uninterested sponsors such as The League of Women Voters, must be restored.  (Access www.debates.org to understand the extent of duopoly control).  The so-called Debate Commission is a corporation to promote the Democratic corporation and Republican corporation, not to inform We The People*Challenge and stop gerrymandering that is a trick especially of the Republican branch of the duopoly.*Stop voter suppression by political Parties, and especially confront and stop Party suppression, which is the over-arching approach to voter suppression.  Party suppression seems to have been the responsibility of the Democratic corporation*Promote by law ranked-choice voting, so we won’t be told again, by D&R duopoly, to “hold your nose and vote”
If these issues are handled, our next elections can be honorable. 
*******************************************************************https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx—-Political Party affiliation of voters.
    https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/league-refuses-help-perpetrate-fraud–LEAGUE REFUSES TO “HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD”

WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE–end of lwv info–Murray Bookchin, who founded social ecology, a theory that strongly influenced early Green Socialist thought, strongly advocated the discussion and study group as the first step of any revolutionary movement. A group of individuals meets to expand their knowledge of radical thought and form a radical intellectual community; through the give and take of discussion, can eventually form ideas for next steps in organizing and political activity. According to Bookchin, study groups help create solidarity and a shared language — with a shared coherent vision — for building a mass, organizing, political movement!