C-Span hosted a number of relevant topics this morning that relate to a majority of the public.  One topic is use of law enforcement to ostensibly tax poverty using policies that persecute by law, people with a lesser ability to pay fines and fees.  

Another hot topic is voter rights.  
A look deeper into the fundamentals of many of these topics can be said to be democracy or a lack of democracy.  Some people may suggest recognition of a creeping totalitarianism which should be predictable when “our system” is capitalism which is specifically hierarchical.  On a continuum capitalism becomes organized crime.
Use of the system to claw one’s way to the top actually encourages drawing up the ladder after supremacy is achieved.  (It’s about the money)
https://www.c-span.org/         —

• 7:00AM EST
  Washington Journal: News Headlines and Viewer Calls
• 8:03AM EST
  Washington Journal: Tony Messenger Discusses His Book “Profit and Punishment”
• 8:49AM EST
  Washington Journal: Geraldo Cadava on Latino Voters & the Republican Party
• 9:36AM EST
  Washington Journal: News Headlines and Viewer Calls

—-end of c-span info–
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-voting-racial-injustice-bills-voting-rights-1c5847d0454f98ed2f9529afc3d1559d   –The bill would provide $6 in public money to campaigns for every $1 in small-dollar donations they raise.–end of apnews info–
Perspective from a 3rd-Party view about HR 1—-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BroZgFAepY0       –TheNowmanShow: 7-7 Discussing HR1 with 2020 Green Party Presidential candidate Howie Hawkins& More!
To question HR 1 may attract accusations of racism from a Democratic Party that uses sexism and racism as campaign strategies.
Many people promote the John Lewis voting right bill (HR 4) over HR 1 because said people promote inclusion of 3rd-Party views rather than only the capitalistic view of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.  The propaganda that “we are a 2-Party system” is a construct of the capitalistic-promoting Republican/Democratic duopoly that functions similarly to the Communist Party of the Former USSR.
When one opposes HR 1, the label of racism is too easily applied by Democratic campaign strategists who in FACT wish to suppress 3rd-Party views.
This strategy blurs the differences between HR 4 and HR 1.  Add to this apparent ignorance that was on display about our electoral system as seen on MSNBC—-Consider the following from 12/18/2021—-And what was occurring on MSNBC?  That would be an interview with Congresswoman Pramilla Jayapal who is a Democrat often described as progressive.  The topic this morning was democracy, which is a new topic for politicians who are most often obsessed with “the economy”, and most commonly the health and well-being of the upper echelon of characters.
Maybe unfamiliarity with the essence of democracy as found in the US Constitution, Ms. Jayapal uttered the phrase that is revolting, (paraphrase)……The only Party that is a pro-democracy Party is the Democratic Party.
Yes she did.  By the way, if our politicians can spew such bunk while our government persecutes Julian Assange for reporting FACTS, shouldn’t questions be asked about “our democracy”?
A few thoughts about the lie that “we are a 2-Party system” —*The US government is not set up as a “2-Party system” by the US Constitution*President George Washington in his Farewell Address specifically warned against political Parties due to the inherent conflict-of-interest*The Democratic Party along with the Republican Party have censored out of debates 3rd-Party voices since Ross Perot so nearly won the Presidency *In 2020 the Democratic Party worked to silence the voices of 3rd-Party candidates, most familiarly Independent Bernie Sanders but not to exclude Green Party Howie Hawkins*Conflict of interest was extant in the Democratic Primary in which the meritorious Jim Clyburn stepped in to short-circuit a growing support for Bernie Sanders which Bernie Sanders is a stalwart of democratic action*Bernie Sanders specifically promotes democratic (small d) socialism which, may one interject, was that which was promoted by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.*Bernie Sanders was denigrated by Democratic Party Establishment characters during a Democratic Presidential Party campaign as being a fake in civil rights because, as one Party member said, “I was in the civil rights movement and I didn’t see Bernie Sanders”
One’s point is that the fraud that “we are a 2-Party system” is standing on the shoulders of so many frauds from the Republican/Democratic duopoly as to appear dictatorial.  The appearance of corruption undermines trust in government.
To hear a Democratic Party Congressperson express the lie on corporate-owned-government-influenced MSM, this time self-defining as “left” as compared to FOX that self-defines as “right”, is to be expected; but is not to remain unchallenged.—end of 12/18/2021 info—
Consider another example of pulling up the ladder after gaining power—Democracy (small d) is a pale reflection of human rights.  https://portside.org/2021-12-17/what-amy-coney-barretts-anti-abortion-code-really-means  –“The safe haven statute completely eliminates the pregnant woman’s burden of parenthood,” petitioners write in a 2015 filing defending Arkansas’ 12-week abortion ban.The idea of safe haven laws as an abortion end-run is now prevalent, if you know where to look. It can be found in the anti-abortion movement’s lobbying at the highest court, but not just there.“With Safe Haven laws, women have an alternative to abortion,” tweeted the research arm of the prominent anti-abortion organization Susan B. Anthony List.–end of portside info–
The control over a woman’s body is retained by each by mandate from the Creator as each imagines as He, Her, It or Cause And Effect.  Attempt by Establishment to control such is beyond democracy and insinuates into human rights which are individual.

Women labeled as Feminists from earlier eras have been denigrated by others who dismiss them as upper-class white women; nonetheless and be as it may, that women in 2021 have any rights may stand on those shoulders—-https://msmagazine.com/2021/12/13/fetal-personhood-women-equality-abortion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-v-jackson/   –From the writing of the U.S Constitution until the second half of the 19th century, federal and state laws nearly always considered married women legal non-entities. Under the doctrine of coverture, a woman’s legal standing became subsumed under her husband’s upon marriage. Women had no right to own property, earn money, maintain custody of children in a rare instance of divorce, or represent themselves politically. In the final decades of the 1800s, women’s rights advocates succeeded, state-by-state, law-by-law, in securing some legal rights for married women.Suffragist Alice Paul penned the Equal Rights Amendment in 1923 to overturn these sex-based laws. But anti-sex discrimination statutes did not succeed until the 1970s when feminist activists and lawyers, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, overturned them and replaced them with equity laws such as Title IX.–end of msmag info–             
https://msmagazine.com/about/         —  Ms. was a brazen act of independence in the 1970s. At the time, the fledgling feminist movement was either denigrated or dismissed in the so-called mainstream media. Most magazines marketed to women were limited to advice about finding a husband, saving marriages, raising babies or using the right cosmetics.—end of msmag info–
The diversity within iconic realities of ’70’s Feminism challenges the fiction that minority women were not permitted within these circles by a modern-day presumption of white female ideology.  Such presumption seems more nearly political Party strategy……again……..————end of example of Amy Coney Barrett——–
One suspects the efforts of women to demand and gain equality was instrumental in the apparent success of Amy Coney Barrett.  She is lauded for achieving such heights, even as she is elevated for her large family.  Notable even though stating the obvious, Amy Coney Barrett seems to gain favor with groups who question a woman’s right to control her own body which could be seen as in opposition to the millions of women behind which she follows; admittedly with enhanced status with what some people see as a betrayal of rights of women.
In other words, while applauding the success of Amy Coney Barrett, room remains to recall the sacrifices of woman across the ages who have fought for freedom and autonomy that Amy Coney Barrett can in 2021 take for granted.  Her success is not emblematic of the struggles of women, but can be seen as presumption, due to a curious inability to understand the reality of others.  In other words she figuratively has one foot on the shoulders of Feminism-over-the-ages and one foot on the shoulder of misogynists, in one person’s imagination.  And perhaps using all tactics available is the system by which such heights are too often reached.
The double talk is no less worrisome as the Democratic Party opines about a lack of voter rights at the same time they actively work to exclude 3rd-Party voices from debates and inclusion on ballots.  
We deserve better.      https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/league-refuses-help-perpetrate-fraud–LEAGUE REFUSES TO “HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD”

WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE–end of lwv info–Murray Bookchin, who founded social ecology, a theory that strongly influenced early Green Socialist thought, strongly advocated the discussion and study group as the first step of any revolutionary movement. A group of individuals meets to expand their knowledge of radical thought and form a radical intellectual community; through the give and take of discussion, can eventually form ideas for next steps in organizing and political activity. According to Bookchin, study groups help create solidarity and a shared language — with a shared coherent vision — for building a mass, organizing, political movement!
Along with Climate Change, many people oppose the imperialism of the USA under control of the Republican/Democratic duopoly.  Use of the wealth of our nation should be to enhance quality of life for We The People rather than for imperialism.  Some people vote accordingly.I———————–That “we are a 2-Party system” is a fabrication of the Republican/Democratic duopoly and spread by MSM.  In FACT the majority of voters aren’t either registered Democratic or Republican.  The censorship about this info must be envied by bureaucrats of the Former USSR and their simplistic style of 1-Party elections.  

Regardless of which character sits in the Oval Office, We The People have work to do to maintain principles of our democratic (small d) Constitutional republic.  Several items to challenge—*We need the integrity of ranked-choice voting so voters won’t feel compelled to “hold your nose and vote”*Censored debates must be stopped.  The Democratic/Republican duopoly pretends to legitimate debates in what is nothing other than another campaign show.  Independent debates run by uninterested sponsors such as The League of Women Voters, must be restored.  (Access www.debates.org to understand the extent of duopoly control).  The so-called Debate Commission is a corporation to promote the Democratic corporation and Republican corporation, not to inform We The People*Challenge and stop gerrymandering that is a trick especially of the Republican branch of the duopoly.*Stop voter suppression by political Parties, and especially confront and stop Party suppression, which is the over-arching approach to voter suppression.  Party suppression seems to have been the responsibility of the Democratic corporation*Promote by law ranked-choice voting, so we won’t be told again, by D&R duopoly, to “hold your nose and vote”
If these issues are handled, our next elections can be honorable. 
*******************************************************************https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx—-Political Party affiliation of voters.