OUR FUTURE

Posted by: admin | on October 18, 2020

Too many Americans have been sidelined by the loud rhetoric from capitalistic hierarchical Establishment.

One such group is children—-https://mailchi.mp/ourchildrenstrust/standing-in-solidarity-1021274?e=b22f370248———Now is the time to finally protect children, of all races, genders, religions, and cultures, and to ensure for “Our Posterity” a system of government that checks the will of the political majority when such will denies a politically powerless minority their personal security, safety, and a livable future. Children cannot vote. They have no voice in our electorate. The courts have a duty to serve as the constitutional protectors of our nation’s youth. We want to share with you our statement and questions we have respectfully requested members of the Senate Judiciary ask the judicial nominee which fall under the following three categories:

Children’s Access to Article III Courts
Constitutional Rights of Equal Protection for Children
Posterity Clause and Being a Good Ancestor

———-end of ourchildrenstrust info—-https://static1.squarespace.com/static/571d109b04426270152febe0/t/5f7d1c9f094eac3ec0a32b57/1602034849632/Supreme+Court+Nominee+Hearing+and+Questions+re+Protecting+Children%27s+Rights_2020.10.01.pdf
If adults are not protecting interests of posterity, should children demand expanded ability to judicial remedy?https://www.ourchildrenstrust.org/supreme-court-nomination
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vbp4aahQ351-7bwB1hjy4yADeJHBR4_2DGtM-RyeHb0/edit

Another side-lined portion of America has been nature and wildlife, unless either are subjected to exploitation.
Rhetoric on the topic of Establishment-connected so-called environmental organizations that may not specifically and primarily have as their goal, protection of the environment, nature, or wildlife, has drawn attention due to comments about “Environmentalist Muir” from under-informed characters. We must reject the bigotry of stereotyping grassroots citizens into predatory Establishment red-herring for ease of denigration. Establishment environmentalists can be as pro-big-money and anti environment as any member of the Democratic/Republican duopoly. This is a political trick, similar to the recent strategy by Democratic Primary characters of attempting to depict all woman as Scarlet O’Hara. Women, like environmentalists, are individuals.
Due to this confusion, one is even more compelled to promote actual environmentalism—-https://cldc.org/news-and-articles/–CLDC’s projects educate people about their rights and why their rights are important, we defend front line activists, and expose and confront the persistent erosion of our civil liberties and the Bill of Rights. We believe knowledge is power, when, people have the tools and understanding to take action and demand that the government honor all their rights, then grassroots activism will be the best chance of exacting necessary change. CLDC educates, supports, and defends grassroots activists.
–end of cldc info–One can draw from this group to get a broader perspective than may be available from Establishment connections.
We do not need to accept propaganda from the Democratic/Republican duopoly as FACT—-https://wbng.com/2020/10/08/2nd-trump-biden-debate-to-be-virtual-due-to-trumps-covid-19/—WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he won’t participate in next week’s debate with Democratic nominee Joe Biden if it’s virtual.Debate organizers announced Thursday that the debate would be virtual because of Trump’s diagnosis of COVID-19. The Commission on Presidential Debates made the announcement a week before Trump and Biden were scheduled to face off in Miami.It said the candidates will “participate from separate remote locations,” while the participants and moderator remain in Miami.—end of wbng info–

Indoctrination includes but is not limited to the following falsehoods—-*Ours is a 2-Party system *Our system is capitalism *The Debate Committee offers informed perspectives from Presidential candidates, when in FACT the debate is a highly-orchestrated performance between candidates chosen by the corporation that is the Republican/Democratic duopoly, while censoring 3rd-Party candidates*Only debates sponsored by the Debate Committee (access www.debates.org to find the Board of Directors an Co-Chairs who are deeply partisan) are illegitimate*The very premise of the Debate Commission that is run by political Parties rather than We The People, is illegitimate
A remedy to this propaganda from the corporations that are the Republican/Democratic duopoly could be to host a debate, whether remote or in person, between Presidential candidates who wish to expose themselves to questions from the public. If cable channel MSM cannot find the funding from big-money interests to host such a debate, perhaps C-Span would be an option. If Donald Trump and Joe Biden refuse to answer questions by participation in such an event, 3rd-Party candidates could still have a forum. A town-hall style Q&A would be the best forum.
C-Span reported at 742AM, that Jo Jorgensen of the Libertarian Party, is attempting to break the stranglehold (my word) by the Republican/Democratic duopoly—-https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/7/jo-jorgensen-libertarian-nominee-campaigns-break-r/–Over the past two months, she has made stops in nearly 30 states, topping even President Trump, with a schedule packed with campaign and official White House events.She may be labeled a “third-party candidate,” but Ms. Jorgensen, the first woman to win the Libertarian Party’s presidential nod, has been campaigning like a top-tier nominee. She is convinced that the more people she can reach, the more they will be willing to break out of the duopoly that dominates American politics.“A wasted vote is a vote for something you don’t want,” Ms. Jorgensen told The Washington Times. “Polls consistently show that people don’t like Donald Trump or Joe Biden. We have a situation where two people are running for office who nobody likes. People should notice, ‘Oh my gosh, I have an alternative.’”
–end of washingtontimes info–
One can make a point that Biden and Trump are not campaigning like top-tier nominees. So far, debates have been nothing short of silly. Policies are not discussed seriously.
One who is called a 3rd-Party candidate, but are top-tier nominees, are Green Party Presidential candidate Howie Hawkins and running mate Angela Walker—https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0Aj5Os3Okw——Angela Walker, Green for VP, responds to the Vice Presidential debate
Why would a voter choose to vote for a candidate who openly admits he/she does not intend to be responsive to the requirements of We The People?
By the way, what’s up with Prima Donna Trump eschewing debate due to his whim. And how is this different from support of Prima Donna status of politicians by the Democratic/Republican duopoly, within the Debate Commission that treats like such, Presidential candidates? WTF?
That Angela Walker has the independence and insight to call racist, the MSM use of Russia as deflection from policy and issues of We The People, is so very much appreciated. One has wondered about the racism of derogation of a total nation.

MSM uses not only Russia as deflection, but so many other issues, as MSM highlights such issues that must become relevant if we are not going to destroy the planet and humanity—-https://www.dailyposter.com/p/harris-did-not-need-to-defend-fracking?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyMTU0NTE0LCJwb3N0X2lkIjo4NTI3MjkxLCJfIjoibzYrSEsiLCJpYXQiOjE2MDIxNjc1NDcsImV4cCI6MTYwMjE3MTE0NywiaXNzIjoicHViLTM3Nzc4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.W_MUU0X-40SBb625ZFu8R4S1XQEM_2GKsjK1OUYPhpA–There’s just one problem with that storyline: It isn’t substantiated by empirical data. Indeed, the idea that a fracking ban is political poison in Pennsylvania is a fantastical tale fabricated by a national press corps that refuses to let public opinion data get in the way of fossil fuel propaganda and a manufactured narrative.
–end of sirota.substack info–
Grassroots organizations are the integrity of the USA—-https://mailchi.mp/transitionus/5-upcoming-events-october?e=0d02132bed–How can we proactively engage with and respond to what could be a hotly contested election? What kind of organizing strategies should we, as part of a diverse grassroots social movement, prioritize in the short-term (pre-inauguration) and longer-term (post-inauguration)? What are the challenges and barriers to getting organized as a social movement during this critical moment?
Join the Transition US Politics & Policy National Working Group for a conversation with Kali Akuno of Cooperation Jackson and People’s Strike and David Cobb of Cooperation Humboldt, moderated by Marissa Mommaerts of Transition US, on these important questions and more.
–end of tranisitionus info–
We The People other than capitalistic hierarchical Establishment, appear to demand a type of Medicare For All. Surely a comprehensive and universal public health care policy goes without saying. We have neither. Nor do the candidates offered by the Republican/Democratic duopoly support either—-https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/29/increasing-share-of-americans-favor-a-single-government-program-to-provide-health-care-coverage/–A majority of Americans continue to say the federal government has a responsibility to make sure all Americans have health care coverage.And since last year, there has been an increase – especially among Democrats – in the share saying health insurance should be provided by a single national program run by the government.–end of pewresearch info–By now, the rhetoric must be acknowledged as such, that private-payer health insurance will forestall rationing of health care. In 2020 in the USA, only the wealthy receive adequate health care.

A primary problem encouraging censorship is the FACT that big-money affiliated MSM is doing the will of big-money interests that own the Democratic/Republican duopoly corporations.
https://www.blackagendareport.com/debate-lesson-2020-election-great-corporate-thug-thon–Biden and Trump expressed their loyalty to capital in competing dialects of American exceptionalism. Trump painted a picture of the exceptional United States as a society under siege from Antifa, China, and the movement for Black lives. Biden slammed Trump for being a divisive president who is unfit to protect the United States from its numerous so-called adversaries. Trump promised “law and order” and a U-shaped economic recovery. Biden promised to restore the “decency” of the United States.
‘”The 2020 election is nothing but a corporate thug-a-thon.”–end of bar info–

Should we care what is the definition of precarity? — the state of having insecure employment or income — That I had to look up the definition implies censorship of the concept.
https://www.blackagendareport.com/bidens-and-trumps-foxes-and-wolves–“The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the ‘smiling’ fox. One is a wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you.” – Malcolm X
Malcolm’s analysis of the U.S. duopoly electoral system still holds true. Donald Trump is the wolf that put a mind-lock on a majority of American whites in 2016 by showing his teeth and snarling at Blacks, Muslims and non-white immigrants, stampeding Black folks deeper into the Democrats’ open fox-jaws. If Trump is defeated at the polls in November, much of Black America will thank Joe Biden for their salvation, just as African Americans credited President Bill Clinton for resisting Newt Gingrich’s racist Republican congressional hordes and their far-right Contract with America, back in 1994. Positioning himself as the only alternative to a Confederate revival – and with the help of Biden, then a young carnivore — Clinton abolished welfare as we knew it, vastly expanded the U.S. prison gulag, and deregulated the Wall Street banks, smiling through his teeth the whole time.–end of bar info–I support the Green Party and Howie Hawkins for President. But more importantly, we need free, fair and clean elections. Whether you vote for Joe Jorgensen of the Libertarian Party or The Peoples Party, or the Green Party, the FACT is the censorship from the Democratic/Republican duopoly destroys democracy—-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5kmdf2wXH4——Peoples Party
We can do better——https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh_-hqI4p14–Howie Hawkins 2020 Campaign Ad – We Hear You
Biden and Trump do not support the policies similar to those of Howie Hawkins. Vote carefully.
*******************************************************************https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx—-

Republicans	Independents	Democrats
	%	%	%
2020 Feb 17-28	30	39	29
2020 Feb 3-16	33	39	26
2020 Jan 16-29	30	42	27
2020 Jan 2-15	27	45	27

—-end of party affiliation info—-
And many of the most non-Establishment voters are in the Green Party.
**************************************As a Green Party registered voter routinely, one re-registers every 4 years into the Democratic Party to be able to cast a vote in the Democratic Primary for Bernie Sanders. One is positive one is not alone in doing so.Lost in the fog of political corruption over several decades, is the fact that the Presidential debates were once in the capable hands of the League of Women Voters—-https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/league-refuses-help-perpetrate-fraud—-Most objectionable to the League, Neuman said, were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings. Neuman called “outrageous” the campaigns’ demands that they control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues.”The campaigns’ agreement is a closed-door masterpiece,” Neuman said. “Never in the history of the League of Women Voters have two candidates’ organizations come to us with such stringent, unyielding and self-serving demands.”Neuman said she and the League regretted that the American people have had no real opportunities to judge the presidential nominees outside of campaign-controlled environments.—-end of lwv info—In other words, (paraphrase) patriarchy says, “we’ll handle it from here, little ladies”—https://straty.com/controlling-outcomes-controlling-table-stakes/—After studying the election process in 1985, the bipartisan National Commission on Elections recommended “turning over the sponsorship of Presidential debates to the two major parties”. The CPD was established in 1987 by the chairmen of the Democratic and Republican Parties to “take control of the Presidential debates”. The commission was staffed by members from the two parties and chaired by the heads of the Democratic and Republican parties… (wikipedia)
—end of straty info—https://www.debates.org/—The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that general election debates between or among the leading candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States are a permanent part of the electoral process. CPD’s primary purpose is to sponsor and produce the quadrennial general election debates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all of the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016
—end of debates info—The Commission on Presidential Debates, replacing the League of Women Voters, controls who can debate and on which topics. They call this educating the public, others may see this as brainwashing. The CPD would profit by hearing from We The People, as to concerns about censorship. The censorship seems to have become so blatant, that petitions to the CPD have reached into the hundreds of thousands. PETITION—–https://www.change.org/p/commission-on-presidential-debates-get-joe-rogan-to-moderate-the-2020-presidential-election/u/25040294——–Thank you all for continuing to share and support this petition. Within the last couple of days, I have composed and sent an e-mail to the Commission on Presidential Debates. The message reads as follows:—-end of change.org info—https://www.debates.org/about-cpd/commission-leadership/—

Commission Leadership

Co-ChairsFrank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr.
Dorothy S. Ridings
Kenneth WollackHonorary Co-ChairsGerald R. Ford*
Jimmy Carter
Ronald Reagan*
George W. Bush
Barack ObamaCo-Chair EmeritusPaul G. Kirk, Jr.Board of DirectorsJohn C. Danforth
Charles Gibson
John GriffenYvonne Hao
Jane Harman
Antonia Hernandez
Reverend John I. JenkinsNewton N. Minow
Richard D. Parsons
Olympia SnoweExecutive DirectorJanet H. Brown* Deceased© COPYRIGHT 2020 THE COMMI—end of debates so-called leadership—-This also filters out any other than Democratic Establishment and Republican Establishment views. This means We The People have nothing to say in our own governance.Consider the large number of voters who do not embrace the policies of either of the Democratic Establishment or Republican Establishment, and the fact that the Democratic Establishment and Republican Establishment have swindled the American electorate out of unbiased information directly from possible Presidential choices; often outside of the Capitalist Party D&R. Since these disgusting events in the ’80’s, state-run/corporate-owned MSM has consistently indoctrinated We The People into accepting the falsehood that “we are a 2-Party system”. This has had the effect of rending illegitimate, the deeply legitimate tradition of free, clean, and fair elections.
In other words, politicians are now choosing their voters, rather than voters choosing their politicians.
Acting on the human frailty of ignorance combined with arrogance, and using as an example the Democratic Establishment, one recognizes what is called a Democratic Base that believes in their right to dictate to others, their voting choices. —–https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/influence-on-democracy/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pIDtvTydkU&t=638s