Tag: people
IS ECONOMY EUPHEMISM FOR DICTATORSHIP?
If people were living in a dictatorship, could control best be wielded over said people by using euphemism rather than direct challenge of control due to dictatorship? For example, if hierarchy stated boldly that the system of government precisely was in place to protect and promote interests of said hierarchy, said people could become restless. But if an idea was imposed in place of the concept of a system in place to protect and promote hierarchy, was used in place of direct language, people could become compliant. What if the euphemism used was “the economy”? Is this notion worthy of discussion?
CENTRALIZED HAUTEUR
C-Span would be of service to offer ideas about a peace budget. We don’t have one at this time. We do however have a very expensive Pentagon budget that seems a prerequisite to maintain business as usual.
LIVING SATIRE
To be clear, this is sometimes called satire. It is a way to express truth rather than FACTS—
DEFINE EDUCATE
Should parents be involved in education? Should government decide the curriculum? How much input is a teacher permitted? We probably haven’t spent enough time demanding and thinking of the definitions used to characterize society. These vague areas are spaces into which dictatorship seep.
CAPITALISM AND CARTELS
So many words are spoken at the public everyday using words that detour away from actual meaning. Words are used to terrorize, inform, or confuse and media is often the vehicle of transmission. When money and power enter into the formula, delusion is possible. An example is the phrase most of us have heard over decades that “we are a 2-Party system”. In FACT our system doesn’t require political Parties, and elections surely shouldn’t be run by political Parties. Yet, this idea is accepted as Constitutional.
FOG OF CAPITALISM
Theoretically capitalism will meet the needs of the most people with little to no governmental intervention. FACTually speaking the evidence tells a different story. In “the West” capitalism is equated with democracy and contrary to communism. In reality capitalism and communism are both hierarchical while democracy is not hierarchical. The propaganda about these topics have been profound and is the work of corporate-owned-government-controlled media in a manner that brings to mind fascism.
REASON
As one who, like the majority of people went along to get along, the ego-busting reality of Climate Change was the catalyst to speak up regardless of consequences. When fracking came to town in Upstate NY and local bureaucrats and politicians bought and paid for by big-money interests began to run so-called news reports over local news channels that were more nearly sales seminars and said individuals shouted their battle cry of “drill baby drill”, the consequences seemed so dire as to eliminate reticence.
CITIZEN OR CUSTOMER?
So White House Press Secretary is going to MSNBC. This seems nothing other than a lateral switch within departments of a corporation. Did the Trump Administration “say out loud the quiet parts”, or were they so honest as to display FACTually that which other Administrations are still dancing around? An example is an expression heard from Jared Kushner (from memory anecdotally and paraphrased) that the US public are the customers of our government.
UTOPIA OR DYSTOPIAN?
An incident of brainwashing is evident in bureaucratic contempt for Utopian ideas. That to reach perfection is ostensibly impossible and the requirement to do so may be unhealthy, to attempt toward as nearly as possible that which is ideal surely isn’t wrong. Yet when ideas are introduced that to support a more equitable life for We The People, along with liberty and justice, you will hear a majority of politicians reject these notions. Yet the personal status of politicians seem to tend to heights of quality of life that are legislatively unavailable to the general public.
In other nations this could be described as dictatorship.
IT’S CALLED INDOCTRINATION BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT IT DOES
America woke up this morning to this important news
FACTually speaking, only most Americans care about somebody hitting somebody over American imperialism
DELUDED INTO INANITY
As one who is deeply unconcerned with another person amassing financial wealth, one does however object to the violence, aggression and tyranny said person presumes due to that accumulation of finances over human sentiment. Those purchased by that wealth is a personal choice. The harm to unconnected people and nature is another thing. Presumption by hierarchy to influence emotionally the public, and includes efforts of the well-paid entertainment industry, will continue to highlight Russian oligarchs as though there are no American oligarchs, as they protect their own territory of wealth and privilege.
YOUR OWN BACK YARD
Establishment has long used the notion of NIMBY to shame and silence local-community members. In FACT, NIMBY seems to be survival and thriving. Local-community members seem to have this right this idea is intrinsic and backed up by the US Constitution.
BOTH HOUSES OF COMMERCE
This morning the host of C-Span, who seems to use all of her faculties to maintain a forum of Free Speech and fairness, seemed to express truth rather than FACT as she reported that Zalensky would address “both Houses of Commerce” instead of using the state-approved label of “both Houses of Congress”.
CLIMATE CHANGE OR WAR?
THESE ARE NOT OUR ONLY CHOICES.
We have more serious topics to consider than interests of individual nations and the ideology of each. The public of the world need to challenge using local communities for the exploitation for the elite. So far local communities aren’t doing so well, but seem to follow the lead from their tormentors.
IMAGINE LIFESTYLE THAT DOES LITTLE HARM
Some corporate-owned-state-run MSM views are heard to call lifestyle with consideration of inflicting as little harm on the environment and each other is “Pollyanna-ish”. This is an extraordinarily violent perspective. Yet we seem sufficiently indoctrinated with hierarchical violence to submit to this mindset. A thoughtful person simply cannot accept this aggression and violence as being normal. This view is surely a choice, but a very bad choice.